categories
archives
rss

After Digital…

The Information Super highway is now more than 20 years old and is beginning to show some wear and tear.


Like early Modernist architecture, the internet has been built on the metaphor of speed, creating a landscape of strip cities made up of internet servers. Yet, whereas architecture creates a powerful topography – the skyline – digital servers remain anonymous - their presence almost unnoticed - mostly underground, bunkered and sealed from the day to day.

And now….

Speaking to a colleague the other day, he asked: what happens when digital technology becomes middle-aged? And this is the point: in a speeded up digital world the technology has already reached its ‘middle-age’ crisis; so many of its dreams, offspring and partnerships have either failed, died or taken up lives of their own. What we are seeing – and limitedlanguage is part of this phenomenon – is a moment of reflection, a wistful interlude where we see a proliferation of blogs which, like Victorian journal entries, try to make sense of the times. Then it was the Industrial revolution, now a more ‘velvet’ technological one where digital design materialises, as once the Arts and Crafts movement did, in the hand-made and the organic; the tactile; the sensual and the interactive.

In the twenty first century this is not an attempt to reject, but to humanise, the digital – we are awaiting the outcomes…

 

9 comments

your comment
I tend to disagree with your view to identify the ‘velvet’technology with art and craft movement. To me the tactile
products of the disital age seems more of abandonment of humanism rather than praise of it. What differentiates human
from animals, in my opinion, is the ability to create a narrative. And this is what lacks in ‘velvet’technology.
I am imagining ipod as a good example of it, for it is invented to ‘personalize’ the huge amount of tunes produced and consumed in the every minute basis. Yet because it has easy access to internet, has huge memory you can never fill up and function that automatically shuffle songs, we end up drawn in the sea of high and low culture musics.
(it speeds up the process of low absorbed into high and be nutralised, consumed and disposed)
They rather appear to me the process of deta-basing human senses. They make us realise our choises, likes and dislikes are not as secred as it used to be, but the result of a combination of incidents that possibly are re-and
deconstructable.
I am not sure if there was something special in art and craft movement to differentiate from today’s cuddly technology though…
Will we be able to create something beyond momentary ‘nice’ out of the velvet technology??

/Anonymous 15/05/2005

 

your commen:

wear and tear means use and therefore the possibility of pushing the boundaries. The web is not like modernist architecture, with an overbearing fascist dictate, regardless of who tries (successfully or not) to control it. ‘PEOPLE’ have had some say in shaping it.

Like all things the web will reach its sell by date, because change is the way of the world. Despite all its visions of the future modernism, from the outset, was locked into a very Eurocentric vision that owed much to the notions of Empire.

Enough with that!!!!

Still, its nice to have something to talk about, nice site.

joel

/joel 16/05/2005

 

your comment
anon: ‘the process of data-basing human senses’ is a rather frightening but beautiful phrase. I wonder how that will play out?

/Monika Parrinder 18/05/2005

 

your comment
I don’t think the web will ‘reach it’s sell-by date’ as Joel says or that there will be a revolution, velvet or not, as Colin and Monika do. Maybe Anonymous is right; any comparisons with the past are misleading. Revolutions, even velvet ones (stealth) come from a past era which believed in the possibility of whole-sale change, and the idea of a future utopia. As the French curator and theorist Nicholas Bourriaud says, no one believes in a future utopia any more. Instead he talks about attempts by contemporary artists to create ‘micro-topias’ in the here and now. His identification of a 1990s tendency in art he calls ‘Relational Aesthetics’ encompasses work which seeks to set up open-ended conditions for (human) relations to develop in a way that interact with and hence change the art work (-in-progress). A common feature of this diverse work seems to be a lack of desire to control what comes out of it. Most of the projects he looks at are outside of the digital realm, but it seems entirely possible that the internet which, at its best, can be interactive, open-ended, ‘live’ and so on should be the site for some of these ideas beyond the art realm. Less data-basing the human senses as Anonymous suggests than using human senses to change the data-base.

/Anon 18/05/2005

 

A sensorial Internet sounds more like an “elephantiasis” of communication.

/j(ay) 21/05/2005

 

> and is beginning to show some wear and tear

this is the moment when it (finally) starts becoming interesting. Maybe the time of invisibility
is over, now that mistakes and frictions start to reveal themselves.

/Adriana 22/05/2005

 

Our original post suggested that the digital age – for want of a better term – has, over the last 20 years, arrived painlessly and without opposition in the creative industries. It has, in the main been used to underpin established practices: font design, illustration, film making etc and now we perceive a change; not just carrying on traditional forms and disciplines in a digital format but addressing what digital means to visual communication. We feel this it is an exciting time where as Adrianna comments ‘…(finally) [it] starts becoming interesting. Maybe the time of invisibility is over, now that mistakes and frictions start to reveal themselves.’

In areas like information design we see a transformation of the usual binary relationship where we simply read and follow the instructions; now we see a more reflective, ‘relational’ development where the person can ‘interact’ or engage in dialogue. This is, perhaps, an attempt to help people navigate the 21st Century – in the same way Margaret Calvert did in the 1960s with her lettering for British Rail or the way Harry Beck’s 1933 map of the London Underground made real the temporal and invisible. In the digital realm of today, people can both create and experience narrative making in many forms; for us, art + com’s installation at the Jewish Museum Berlin is a good example of this progress.
http://www.artcom.de/index.php?option=com_acprojects&page=6&id=14&Itemid=144&details=0&lang=en

Or, maybe, as is implicit in J(ay)’s comment; it will eventually collapse under its own weight…

/the editors 25/05/2005

 

Looking at all the blogs on this site, one thing they seem to share is a questioning of the image in contemporary culture – mistrust even. Digital technology has provided a vehicle for this mistrust, especially over the last 5 year or so, by making the manufactured image ubiquitous – television, video, film, computers, mobile phones etc have provided a constant bombardment of images in our lives but I am not sure we can blame the technology for the output or the weight of it. Digital technology, especially in film, has brought about a more egalitarian and democratic access to film making – a space which is only just beginning to be occupied, especially by people outside of the axis of western capitalism – I am sure the same can be said for music (mp3), design (fontographer), photography (Photoshop etc) and the list goes on – I am surprised no one has shouted this louder in these comments – I would like to see more evidence of these new little pockets of visual stuff going on – it is out there !! (Sorry less than 200 words!)

/joe 30/05/2005

 

In November 2009 we released the book ‘Limited Language: Rewriting Design: Responding to a feedback culture’ which re-engaged with this original post.

For more on the book as a whole: http://bit.ly/bookcomments

Monika + Colin

/colin 15/11/2009

 

write a comment

we encourage people to recycle your comments in their own research as we may collage them into our own writing with the aim to publish the resulting articles (any post eventually used will be credited). We encourage comments to be 200 words or more.

line and paragraph breaks automatic. e-mail address will never be displayed. html allowed: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>