categories
archives
rss

Analogous cities

“With cities, it is as with dreams: everything imaginable can be dreamed, but even the most unexpected dream is a rebus that conceals a desire or, its reverse, a fear. Cities, like dreams, are made of desires and fears, even if the thread of their discourse is secret, their rules absurd, their perspectives deceitful, and everything conceals something else.”
Italo Calvino (Invisible Cities 1972)

Sometimes I feel that our physical experience of the city is less clear or less comprehensible than the image or idea of the city. The complexity of cities makes them difficult if not impossible to fully understand; so we prefer instead to only seek to understand their images. We favour a city built not from brick, stone and glass, but one constructed from memory, association and history.

Nicholas Roeg’s film Don’t Look Now is a favourite of mine, and I have seen it a many times. I also love Venice the city in which it is set and I visit there regularly. Each time that I see this film I am intrigued by its fragmented juxtapositions of space and time. As the actors move through the city from location to location, there is no regard for geography or journey. They pass a palace on the Grand Canal and then seconds latter they are outside the Biennale gardens. This fragmentation of location is, however, only evident if you are very familiar with Venice. Roeg has constructed a new Venice, an identified city, something suited to his purpose.

This type of collaged continuality is not uncommon in cinema. We have all seen films shot in cities that are well known to us, were the director is keen to emphasis the location of the action and has therefore staged a car chase that passes in no logical order every landmark building in the city. As we watch we realise that this is another London, Paris or New York. A perfect condensed city of images, a place in which everything is near. I love the opportunity these false cities gives us to separate the real and the analogous city. I sometimes feel that these comprehensible cities are better, more identifiable that actual places.

In Aldo Rossi’s seminal book The Architecture of the City (MIT 1982), he shows us a painting by Giovanni Canaletto seemingly of Venice, in which Palladio’s unbuilt project for the Rialto Bridge, the Basilica of Vicenza, and the Palazzo Chiericati (also in Vicenza), are all arranged as if they were an actual part of a real city. It looks like Venice, but it is not. It is more than Venice; it is an analogous city, a city that expresses the idea of the city more perfectly but less factually than the actual city. Rossi says “Athens, Rome, Constantinople, and Paris represent ideas of the city that extend beyond their physical form, beyond their permanence; thus we can speak in this way of cities like Babylon which have all but physically disappeared” (The Architecture of the City, page 128).

Now we have another Venice, within a hotel in Las Vegas; it is a city of paper thin facades set around a crystal clear canal. A strange ugly copy that makes little attempt to replicate real places or forms. Unlike the other Venice the sky is always blue and it is very clean. Although it is banal, vapid and clichéd, when I saw this Venice it surprised me how it caused me to recall in detail the charm and intricacy of the ‘real’ city by way of its inaccuracy.

This got me thinking about other cities, the cities that I have never visited. When I imagine these cities I see all the great buildings gathered together along one street or around a single square. I know that when I do visit it will not be like that, but for now this will have to do.

In the 1970s the station identity for Thames Television featured all the major buildings, the Palace of Westminster, St Paul’s, Tower Bridge, etc all grouped together in an impossible silhouette. I always loved the fact that this perfect London, a London that does not exist, should be the image of London. To those who knew, it was a fabrication and those who did not, it was perfection. Quoting again from Calvino we can see that a city can be what ever you can imagine it to be, but only that.

(http://625.uk.com/tv_logos/thames.htm)

“From now on, I’ll describe the cities to you,” the Khan had said, “in your journeys you will see if they exist.” But the cities visited by Marco Polo were always different from those thought of by the emperor. “And yet I have constructed in my mind a model city from which all possible cities can be deduced,” Kublai said. “It contains everything corresponding to the norm. Since the cities that exist diverge in varying degree from the norm, I need only foresee the exceptions to the norm and calculate the most probable combinations.”
I have also thought of a model city from which I deduce all others,” Marco answered. “It is a city made only of exceptions, exclusions, incongruities, contradictions. If such a city is the most improbable, by reducing the number of abnormal elements, we increase the probability that the city really exists. So I have only to subtract exceptions from my model, and in whatever direction I proceed, I will arrive at one of the cities which, always as an exception, exists. But I cannot force my operation beyond a certain limit: I would achieve cities too probable to be real.”

Italo Calvino (Invisible Cities 1972)

David Phillips 2005

 

11 comments

This is a beautifully written piece. I’m not sure that we always prefer a city constructed from memory. What i like about my adopted city (Toronto) is that most of the memories get swept away with the grime off the streets, on a cyclical basis, or built over and upon.

/Anon 16/10/2005

 

Are your cities analogue or analogies?

/Ben Dobson 16/10/2005

 

The image of the ideal city is deep-rooted in Christendom, coming from the heavenly city or ‘New Jerusalem’ of the book of Revelation. And isn’t it interesting that the human story in the Bible begins in a garden, but ends in a city? It’s curious, also, how cities figure in other great religions: Muslims turn towards Mecca, Hindus make the pilgrimage to Varanasi. Even Buddhism, which has never seemed to me to be a particularly urban religion, has its great temple cities of Borobodur and Angkor Wat.

Maybe this is the point, though. In religious terms, humanity is placed by God in a state of nature along with the other animals, but having been evicted through the acquisition of self-consciousness, it cannot be our destiny to return to the garden. Instead, the culmination of the human story is seen as the creation of a perfect city - made by human hands - in which we can dwell. The city is therefore an emblem of the completed person, the person who has “builded Jerusalem” (in Blake’s lovely, active image) both “among these dark Satanic mills” (the lightless, endlessly voracious desire for self-confirmation?) but also “In England’s green and pleasant land” (as a fulfilment of the natural order?). It’s thus also a symbol of what is uniquely human - what we initiate as free, autonomous beings - as opposed to what are driven to by our animality or selfishness.

Inevitably, then, the image of the city as an archetype of what Jung called “The Self” (true human individuality) is so potent that we can hardly avoid projecting it onto the real cities in which we live and work - both negatively as dystopia, as well as positively as an ideal (noting in passing that More’s ‘Utopia’ was also conceived as a city). But that’s the beauty of our symbols, isn’t it? That they aren’t just some abstract ’signifiers’, pinned like butterflies in the intellect of a French philosopher, but are instead living things in a constantly evolving dialogue with their physical equivalents (and vice versa). Looked at in this way, it’s no surprise that Venice - a city built not on earth, but on water (fluidity? life?) - has captured so many imaginations. Even in replica. And what cities can be as beautiful, as mysterious, as sinister or as rich in possibilities as those we encounter in our dreams?

james

/james souttar 17/10/2005

 

>condensed city of images

tour guides point out spots in the city, directing the gaze. they walk on paths that contain the densest information of interest for tourists. adjust and updating their routes to integrate new attractions. on a tour in berlin, after talking about the brandenburg gate the tourguide turns to point at a window of the nearby hotel adlon; the site of the infamous michael jackson incident.

/Adriana 31/10/2005

 

This article provoked images of Disneyland, a place giving a memory for the visitor to hold and return with in the future. Walt Disney created a space that was manipulative and powerful by its structure and controlling design. He wanted the place to be a representation of togetherness, which he imposes on the visitor, stripping them of all previous problems and thoughts about the place. Most of all stealing their identity and opinion. He attempts at creating a place of dreams where there are no fears or longing desires to be fulfilled. A place that is everyone’s dream of what America is like. The ‘city’ is controlled down to the very last detail, the food you have to eat there, the way you have to journey through the space. This is how he believes America wants to be seen and represented, a place where everyone is falsely happy and in denial. The only escape is the huge car park outside where you are left to your own thoughts and opinions in peace. A discourse is created around Disneyland as being the ‘place of dreams’. Another controlled city is that of sunshine, a place in America with its own legal system, which stretches as ridiculously as the restricted length of grass you are allowed and the tones of paint you can use within your home. I question why people would purposely strip themselves of such privileges and freedom to live in such controlled environments. I am grateful for places such as Venice that allow freedom for the mind and that are based on uncontrolled content. Cities that have real memories and real dreams surely are more desirable than those of false identity and denial. With places of such natural beauty and appeal I question why people would place themselves within the small controlling hands of Walt Disney and people of power influenced minds?

Jade Adams-wood

/jade adams-wood 19/11/2005

 

This article reminds me a village in Middle-East that i went a few years ago and i call it a place of my dream, which is warm and mineral water springs,flowers and fresh air, silence and simplicity of the natural landscapes, mountain and rocky areas.
This village also has preserved the art, culture, history and architecture. Local people are wearing traditional dresses, men and women working shoulder to shoulder all day and dancing around the fire at nights. The style of their life is very simple and beautiful. The whole village were like a big family and care for each other, their hospitality and kindness of each person was unbelievable. They weren’t rich, they didn’t have computer, mobile phone or other modern facilities that we have in here, the only thing they care is being with their family, working together, enjoying together and share their love not like us, we are living in one of the most beautiful cities in the world with the maximum modern technology, but unfortunatly we are like a little robat in the little boxes and i sometimes questioning myself why? Are we living in a same world as those people are or different one?

/Homeira Nekkui 29/11/2005

 

The cities referred to as ‘dream cities’ are generally cities and places to which people have strong emotional and sentimental ties, or places where memories are made. I believe it is due to this fact that places such as Las Vegas are so popular because they use the most basic, most stereo-typical aspects of a place to ‘recreate’ them. In reality though, these places are not recreated but they do make people remember the real place itself and all the best points about it, as is stated in the passage above, and this is a key point. The recreation uses these stereo-typical images and aspects in the way souvenirs, photographs and graphic representtions - such as the fore-mentioned London sky line image - are used. They are used to represent and symbolise the place and trigger memories and feelings - as well as the dreams - of the given place.

/Nicola Friel 06/12/2005

 

It’s a great concept, hundreds of cities portrayed from memory but eventually turning out to be just one, Venice. Italo Calvino’s book is beautifully written and delivers the strong ideology of peoples perception of cities. I too prefer the nostalgia and the essence of “invisible” cities. However I do not trigger such emotions through focusing on imagery alone. It is often a smell or a type of music that absorbs me in an atmospheric zone. Influence from illustrations, films, animations and computer games create the foundation for reference but my imagination runs off to an epic land. Colours reminiscent of Turner paintings and weather like that of tsunami, ruin cities and empty faces surround my imagination. It gives me great pleasure when I read books such as these where I can visit someone else’s perception. A couple of years ago I had to illustrate the city of Eusapia from Calvino’s Invisible cities. My class mates had the same task but the diversity was amazing and how each student adapted their own viewpoint on the city was rewarding in itself.
Lewis Parker a musician from Camden creates beautiful sounds capes where my initial thoughts are that of an imaginary city. Not a perfect one or a “new Jerusalem” just a genuine isolated area for myself when I have spirited away from the mundane monotony of modern life. The time periods change and I have a particular liking for Alexandra the Great. Science fiction and retro space age cities are in the back of my mind sometimes. In reality I’m most comfortable in the crowded concrete city of London or Taipei. Quite a contrast from the lonely waste land of my thoughts, my child hood could be the scapegoat but not relevant to such incidents.

/Wei-Chun Kao 07/12/2005

 

I agree with some of my fellow student that the dream cities are generally cities and places to which people have strong emotional and sentimental ties,or places were people lived an experience. A lot of people do a lot of dreaming of perfect places trying to escape the reality and that brought to me the images of Disneyland,Disny had created a space was manipulative powerful by its structure,he wanted that all his visitors to forget about thier problems, thoughts and openions,he wanted them to live an ideal dream the American dream where there are no fears or longing desires to be fulfilled.The city is controlled down to every detail from space perfect houses,to the food one eats,and that what he wanted America to be seen by the rest of the world.I always wonder why some people strip themselves such freedom to live such controlled enviroments.I believe that a lots if not the majorety of American do not even watch the news ,they live in a dream.I think I prefer my real world the city where a live real life and learn about other people try to help live and share experience with others.Cities that have real memories and real dreams that can be realised.I always wondered with all the beautiful reall places that we have in our world why some people choose to live such controlled life such as Disney world.

/Anonymous 16/12/2005

 

In November 2009 we released the book ‘Limited Language: Rewriting Design: Responding to a feedback culture’ which re-engaged with this original post.

For more on the book as a whole: http://bit.ly/bookcomments

Colin + Monika

/colin 15/11/2009

 

This might provide an interesting extension of experience to that described in David’s article - “Museum of the Phantom City”, an application for Apple’s iPhone which debuted as a free download in October 2009. It is sponsored by New York’s Van Alen Institute and designed by Irene Cheng and Brett Snyder. It is designed to provide: “a tour of the New York that doesn’t really exist. Their application enables users to discover unrealised projects – by Steven Holl, Superstudio, Hugh Ferriss, Archigram, Buckminster Fuller, Rem Koolhaas, and many more – in situ around the city.”

I found it here: http://www.iconeye.com/index.php?view=article&catid=1%3Alatest-news&layout=news&id=4298%3Areview-museum-of-the-phantom-city&option=com_content#

/Katy 11/02/2010

 

write a comment

we encourage people to recycle your comments in their own research as we may collage them into our own writing with the aim to publish the resulting articles (any post eventually used will be credited). We encourage comments to be 200 words or more.

line and paragraph breaks automatic. e-mail address will never be displayed. html allowed: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>