categories
archives
rss

Boredom, b’dumb, b’dumb…

Communication. It is an easy word. It slips off the tongue without a thought. It is with us all the time: the scribbled note pinned on a door to say ‘back in 5’, the jerky prose of the txt, or that blinking on-off banner advertisement on every website (but not this one).

But what does it take to slow us down? Or look hard and think carefully? In a world of fast communication, words and images seek us out. They seem to be irrepressibly alive. Writing about the ability of a young office worker to sing the tin-pan alley hits of the day, Siegfried Kracauer observed ‘But it is not she who knows every hit, rather the hits know her, steal up behind her and gently lay her low.’ That was 1929: today our pop commodities are more aggressive. Do you recall the ‘accidental’ exposure of a pumped-up breast during the Super Bowl intermission? Or the ‘spontaneous’ outpourings of emotion triggered by the death of a Polish Pope?

Communication is now the business of shock and awe. But of course real affect cannot be pre-progammed. It acts by accident and with stealth. Think of those snapshots of American soldiers with the instinctive ‘thumbs up and smile’ gesture hovering over a corpse. The awful pixilated blur hiding a beaten face. The shock lay in the apparent innocence of these products of the photographic reflex.

So in a world of visual noise, where might we find a quiet invitation to look and to think? Might it be possible for graphic design to operate as a system to slow down perception to create silences in the noisy media world? Or perhaps even stillness - this is simply just another tool, another technique. What is the alternative to the heady stimulation of communication? What happens, asked Kracauer, if we allow ourselves to become truly and deeply bored: ‘if one has the patience, the sort of patience specific to legitimate boredom, then one experiences a kind of bliss that its almost unearthly … in ecstasy you name what you have always lacked.’ What is it that you have always lacked? Have you ever been bored enough to find out?

David Crowley

 

13 comments

I have noticed recently how people in face to face conversation glance furtively at their silent mobile phones, almost like a nervous tick, you see people looking at their phone, brushing its face, pushing at the numbers, moving it from hand to hand or just placed on the bar, cafe table or wherever – sitting like a benign member to the conversation. This behaviour, I think, reflects a contemporary position towards boredom, in our ‘wired’ world, boredom is associated with being out of touch, not part of the wired loop made up of texts, emails, Wifi, chat rooms etc. In its most extreme form boredom is synonymous with being alone! Post 1990’s, we are allowed ‘down-time’ but the Romantic notion of loneliness is now seen as almost socio-pathological – being in a constant state of ‘connectedness’ is a modern day defence against being alone… In italy there is a ‘slow food’ movement, maybe a similar movement in graphic design might introduce us to the spiritual qualities of boredom…?

/Anonymous 07/05/2005

 

your comment
I’m not actually sure it’s possible to get bored any more, not in the ‘real’ sense that Kracauer suggests. This isn’t some nostalgic view that boredom isn’t as good as it used to be…but it certainly isn’t the same. There are so many mundanities to attend to…emails, calls, to-do-lists… it may be that the luxury of time that it takes to get truly, deeply, blissfully bored is no longer available to us.

Paradoxically, it is because new technology speeds and compresses our time, that it also presents us with moments that feel interminably long and it is perhaps here that a kind of ‘contemporary boredom’ resides - the waiting for a friend to stop texting someone else, for the computer to boot up or the web-page to load. Although, isn’t this really impatience? - which is not, if Kracauer is to be believed, conducive to legitimate boredom.

And yet ironically, in our shock-and-awe world, it is boredom that has sought us out in the guise of reality tv. In the early Big Brother shows, it turned out that ‘reality’ was rather boring…people hanging around on sofas at 2am on their own, doing nothing - awe at the ‘immediacy’ of real-time became dulled by the shock of its slowness. It’s a cliché to say that what we have got isn’t reality at all, but this was/is not boredom as we know it. Perhaps, it is on tv that we come closest to a glimpse of old-skool boredom - people with lots of time on their hands and nothing they are inclined to do (ultimately because in the Big Brother house there is no tv).

But is watching other people being (not truly, deeply, blissfully but) pretty damned bored on tv to really experience boredom oneself? For me, at 1am, I would watch it because I could neither be bothered to stay properly awake or go to bed. Watching not induced by, or inducing, boredom but a kind of limbo/stasis in which very little is being processed by the brain.

Boredom is surely an extreme, and we hardly experience extremes anymore, unless it’s to do with the weather: only limbos; in-betweens; will-they-calls? I’d better stay up in case it suddenly gets goods; when will they stop texting someone elses? What we have instead, in our contemporary world, is so often dissatisfaction.

We are waiting, and we are a bit bored of it…but what are we waiting for?

/Lisa 16/05/2005

 

your comment

/Anonymous 16/05/2005

 

your comment
Boredom exists…Boredom is making cups of tea in just about any design office (and not just on placement). Oh, and arranging the book spines according to height (CDT in particular). Although, it seems, that might have amused someone else.

It’s clear that the graphic design industry, as it currently exists, cannot ‘operate as a system to slow down perception to create silences in the noisy media world’, and yet, unintentionally, it may give us the physical space/head space in which to try.

For, it is during these periods - as one stirs in the milk into the cup, to the designated pantone reference (they pretend it’s ironic but really it’s gleefully given) - that the seeds of creative subversion (bliss) may usefully be sewn.

/rachel Woods, London 16/05/2005

 

your comment
I was on the tube yesterday and there was a poster for some Microsoft Office connectivity package that said ‘The “I’m out of the office and out of the loop” era is over.’ The picture was of a business man in an airport lounge relaxing with a latté and a dinosaur’s head really badly photo-shopped on. This isn’t my beef with the poster, but the way contemporary life/people/companies is/are set on stealing any last possibility for ’slow’ moments that we have, be they relaxing or boring ones. I think this tendancy is going will hopefully produce the opposite reaction and elevate boredom to be seen as the new freedom.

/Simon 18/05/2005

 

graphic design would learn well that when one becomes bored [still possible] with IMAGE [yet, still] one turns to TEXT*** // graphic design as a language [shirk industry] has great wells of unfound potential to enhance reflection + mediated experience by learning that time means little or nothing–the field was beginning to figure that out in the 90s but a few things got in the way and amnesia set in. patience, patience.

***cheers to this site and its design for providing a bit of proof + helping to reverse the amnesia

/tony, raleigh nc 19/05/2005

 

Tony is right, I think we have become ‘bored’ with the image and I think it is because of its fakery – its manicured presence, bored of the same old con. Design/communicators need to see that the bubble of the simulacrum has burst. For when we are sitting drinking our cappuccino in Starbucks, we need something more tangible than imagery– Starbucks might be a version of America which arrives ‘flat packed’ ready to install on the high street (everywhere!) BUT, no one sits there, thinking they are having a NYC moment – the trickery does not work, in fact, it is condescending to think interior/graphic design could pull off such a trick – its only when graphic design becomes bored and, with a huge yawn, reflects on its position will it be able to jump off the conveyor belt of images…

/Seb 21/05/2005

 

Do you remember the cover of The Guardian G2 section on the day after George W Bush one his second electin last November? It simply said in white on black: “Oh God”. Clearly there was an exasperation with Bush, but also with (photographic) images?

/Monika Parrinder 22/05/2005

 

Boredome in the context of the visual could be the inability to see what you see: The kind of blindness that occurs in the center of vision. Boredome therefore is not a lack of activity, but when vision becomes numb and unable to feel itself. This webdesign doesn´t do that.
So the boredome is due to speed and the slowness or natural economy of feelings. Vision without feeling, or affectivity, is irrelevant, and therefore boring.

Its a kind of dead vision, or the eye of the living dead, that simply scanns things simply to classify and control.

/morten kjerulf 23/05/2005

 

Morten presents an interesting way into looking at the question of boredom and the visual realm and has made me reconsider my position. I think we are now only interested in (trust?) peripheral vision; as high streets across the globe are colonised by a world of Gap, Starbucks, Ikea etc – the usual corporate topography – it creates a kind of white-out – we are now looking for something beyond this, something which has a temporality on a local scale rather than the speeded-up mantra of globalization.

The peripheral media of blogs came to the centre of our vision during the Iraq war when the ’embedded’ traditional press were seen as tainted - not to be trusted. The digitised age of photo manipulation has further undermined any sense of visual truth (see Monika’s comment above)

The avant-garde have always played a role in pricking the (corporeal) pupil when a visual/textual malaise has threatened – graphic communication so often appropriates, or at least plays a subservient role, to this phenomenon. I would argue at a time when museum culture also ‘scans things [art] simply to classify and control’ we might be at a moment when (tentatively!) visual communication breaks the tedium – and allows a re-connection with, and belief in, the visual and the everyday… Sites like this one are exploring this archaeology (maybe?).

/colin 30/05/2005

 

‘Vision without feeling’ as mentioned above is how I would I would describe boredom. I agree that without inflicting emotion on the viewer the image is effectively dead. If you sat a person in an empty room without colour or inspiration that would provoke boredom and I would compare that to the use of communication that we are so used to. ‘Text’ was before, inspiring it was a new language that we could effectively create ourselves and by receiving it was exciting as you’d be faced with something no before seen or read and required a certain level of interpretation. Without new communication media we will inevitably acquire boredom due to lack of challenge.
In relation to Colin’s comment on museum culture, I think that is also being questioned. Do we go to see a piece of art (something new and exciting) or are we playing a dangerous game of just visiting there to see the views or go to the restaurant. We could be creating boredom by not being creative enough. Are we becoming a ‘play the safe card generation?’ do we need to change our ways for the good of our own development?’

/jade adams-wood 19/11/2005

 

Too much in the city

We don’t even name and recognize some visual arts because they are part of our daily life. Could this mean we are bored with them? Are we so much surrounded by communication, words, pictures, logos that we don’t even see they exist?

I am not sure we are “bored” with them, probably rather too busy to see them. We live in an “image civilization” and it is particularly pronounced in cities. We are surrounded by art and graphic communication of all sorts. Because it is part of our daily city life we don’t even notice it anymore. We are bombarded with adverts, invitations, special offers, companies logos all present to catch our attention. . Every single printed document has been carefully been thought about. Whether it’s just a poster, a book or CD cover, all of them have for purpose to attract our attention. It is calling for a subconscient reading, forced onto us, our eyes are to be caught regardless of our intention (or rather un-intention). Everywhere in the city, adverts on the tube, bus, shop windows… Walking down the street, leafleters trying to hand you out all sorts of eye catching flyers. It is in actual fact impossible to take a look at every piece of image and written printed material that surround us all. At university students organise weekly exhibitions and many free art booklets types representing students work are displayed and waiting to be picked up. But I do not think many people actually take a copy of the printed work or even glance at them ( and if they do, it is probably a quick look before it ends up in the bin). The same also applies for museums and exhibitions. Why? Is it because we are spoilt for choice we don’t know which one to go to? Is it because living in a fast paced environment we do not actually have “the time to take the time” to go there? Is it because we know that we can always pick up some knowledge “another time” as it always around us. I believe that someone living in the countryside or a smaller city would be more receptive to art, and in this instance exhibitions. Where I grew up (in the surroundings of a small city), we treated them as a special occasion. Because we did not have the choice we are spoilt for in London. Because exhibitions would take place infrequently, I believe we used to be more enthusiastic about it and I believe it had more memory impact too. Because it felt as if it had come to us and it we would feel the need to go and visit. Because it would be gone tomorrow….But in London it will still be there tomorrow, and the day after, or a similar exhibition will take place, again. I am full of great intentions, I enjoy museums, art, photography, exhibitions yet the most I see of them seem to be when I am abroad, on holiday. For some reason that’s when I find more motivation and get more excited about it. Why can’t I do the same in London? Is it because I don’t have the time? Most probably I don’t think I have the time…But I am sure I could find it…if only I wanted. Does anyone feel like I do? Living in the fast paced, spending so much time in public transports, going from a place to another, whether it’s work, university, meeting up with friends…So much wasted time travelling. Aren’t we tired? (or ARE WE REALLY?) Isn’t it easier on our days off to just stay in and “relax” whether it’s cleaning, watching some (boring) television programs or having a quick shopping trip down the road or not to mention spending countless hours on the internet (don’t we all do it?). A “culture trip” to the West End can appear like such an expedition , requiring time that we don’t often seem to have in this city. Isn’t it easier to postpone it to “another time”. And we know we can catch it ANY time. But how often will we really?
Can too much communication blind us? Can too much choice lead to less motivation? I wonder…

/S Bervas 16/12/2005

 

In 2009 we released the book ‘Limited Language: Rewriting Design: Responding to a feedback culture’ which re-engaged with this original post.

For more on the book as a whole: http://bit.ly/bookcomments

Colin + Monika

/colin 15/11/2009

 

write a comment

we encourage people to recycle your comments in their own research as we may collage them into our own writing with the aim to publish the resulting articles (any post eventually used will be credited). We encourage comments to be 200 words or more.

line and paragraph breaks automatic. e-mail address will never be displayed. html allowed: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>