categories
archives
rss

Design in Crisis

At first sight, all branches of design seem to be prospering. “The obsession with designer brands continues to expand, embracing home products, clothing accessories, and fashions for adults and young people. This became a sort of religion for the consumer society of the nineties, and was deeply embedded in all socio-economic group levels”. This new culture writes about design and fills the sky with bright new stars. Design activities all over the world are increasing exponentially. Design reacts to technology faster than art, and this is very conspicuous as regards the digital developments that have been taking place ever since the mid-seventies.

Designers and important design groups have been involved in this revolution from its very beginning and actively influenced its development. This was not a fringe culture, but an integral part of the revolution. They created the mouse, the window, the button and the web’s visual experience. The influence on metaphors and symbols created by designers at that time cannot be compared in its scope to art, architecture or even to the design of other products. Whereas art is still trying to comprehend the video innovation, design determined the way in which people work and act in the cybernetic world. But at the same time design is going through a difficult crisis. Grey clouds gather beneath its wings - ethical issues related to consumerism, pollution, and the exhaustion of raw materials as opposed to temptation, the creation of endless collections, and the sterility of renovation. Design finds itself coveted by new disciplines that boast of dealing with ‘aesthetics’. The weak flutter which began with plastic surgery to correct damages after accidents or war, gradually becomes ‘redesigning the human body’ for capricious aesthetic reasons. Standard operations, such as nose-jobs or skin grafts are replaced by new interventions that include ‘overhauling’ the body and cosmetic surgery. The physician no longer heals. (S)he ‘creates’. The intention is more to design than to cure. ‘Body designer’ or ‘Appearance designer’ are more correct terms to define these professionals, and they are closer in their intention to fashion designers and hair stylists than they care to believe.

Prof. Ezri Tarazi (This is an abstract from the catalogue for the group show “installation - Situation” at the Haifa Museum of Art 2005)

 

9 comments

“But at the same time design is going through a difficult crisis”

Design was a dog.

Design was born the runt of the litter puppy from the bitch of advertising. Design obeyed the orders of its master. It had teeth but never bit. It got kicked and abused, but always returned to its master, tail between its legs. Design thought fetching a stick made it useful. Design chased its own tail and called it debate. Obsessed with utility, efficiency and rationality design ate its own shit and licked its own arse. Design became infested with notions of the romantic individual. Design wanted to be the Wolf that was Art. Design became the sheep in sheeps clothing. Design was slaughtered.

Design is dead.

But fear not, the time of the maggots is upon us.

Feeding. Reading. Digesting. The maggots converse. They develop. They discuss. They collect. They grow. They develop. Together. Sharing. Forming a mass. They develop. Transform. Emerge. Senses alert. Fast to react. Keen to spread dis-ease. Driven to disrupt the dreams of the comfortable.

They swarm.

/The Swarm 17/05/2006

 

It’s funny, so often when one hears talk about a ‘crisis’ with something, the crisis turns out to be ‘why does nobody appreciate us any more!’. Why this is the case with design is not hard to see: design was the product of modernism - of an era when there was a popular appetite for grandiose personal visions, and for being led. And unfortunately it hasn’t moved on: nobody wants a Stalin or a Corbusier telling them how they should live any more. Or almost nobody. However, organisations still have an desire to express their corporate grandiosity, and so plenty of work remains for designers: gherkins to build, brands to gush about, cookie-cutter products to style.

Of all design disciplines, architecture seems to have been the one best able to reinvent itself - perhaps because its crisis happened in the eighties, when graphics was still at its apogee. I was looking yesterday at the flowering wild grasses on the roof of the new library building at the Horniman Museum, and was impressed with the way that ’sustainability’ is becoming part of the mainstream of architecture. And how creatively sustainable solutions are being approached. There are, of course, the Fosters and the Coates’ still creating monuments to money and power, but the most interesting architecture being done seems to have really grasped what it means to design at a human scale.

Graphic design, on the other hand, continues to be resistant to the idea of ‘communication on a human scale’ - which really means not one person telling everyone else how it is, but an opportunity for a community and diversity of voices to be expressed, and for dialogue to take place. The really exciting mavericks of the life sciences - Lovelock, Margulis, Goodwin, Sahtouris, Maturana et al. - have been suggesting for some time that life is not a ‘top down’ creation, but a complex self-organising and ‘emergent’ phenomenon. When this understanding eventually filters into our conceptions of communication, we will undoubtedly see a paradigm shift of an unprecedented kind. But for the moment, angst and same-old same-old.

james

/james souttar 29/05/2006

 

i agree with james on his assessment, but i’m not quite as pessimistic. i think there are many places where interesting design is being practised, or is on the brink of happening anyway. they may not show themselves in obvious places or in an obvious/visual way, but that probably has to do with both the attitude of the designers who feel it more worthwile working than showing off their work in the design media circus (maybe the design media need to become more tuned in anyway instead of showing the same-old same-old work..), but also because designing no longer necessarily means producing something visual/concrete/lasting/consumeable.. that doesn’t mean however that they are not practising! the times are changing and so are the ways in which design manifests itself

i can only refer to cedric price who demanded there to be enough space accomodated in the design (process/object) for doubt, delight and change

p.s. if anybody wanted to give me some money i would make a publication (of some sort) about these interesting forms of design practiese that have in many cases been quietly going on for quite a while

/adriana 03/06/2006

 

Adriana, I loved the Cedric Price observation. Yes.

I’m not such a pessimist, actually - or, at least, only about the design ‘establishment’ (which is arguably more ‘established’ in its own mind than in anyone else’s). As far as ‘graphic design’ is concerned - ‘visual communication’, or whatever else we want to call it - the tools are pretty much in everyone’s hands now. So I’m sure we will see more and more alternative approaches to design appearing from those currently outside the design camp.

Soon enough, too, ‘World Design’ will finally break down the xenophobic levees of the still dominant Northern European/North American tradition and a flood of scripts, colour and imagery will bring change, and delight, and perhaps some doubt to our oh-too-worthy approaches to communication. Well, it’s clearly beginning to happen already.

The big problem, as I see it, for us as a design community is not that we don’t have the skills or opportunities to do anything more interesting - but that we don’t, actually, have anything much to say. I’d see the exciting developments in graphics over the next 20 years or so coming from unsuspected quarters - and from groups and people who have something genuinely new they want to communicate.

The precursors here must be things like psychedelic or punk design, where the tools of design were hijacked to develop visual languages felt to be more appropriate to the zeitgeist. Of course the design critics rake over the back catalogue of materials now felt to be ’seminal’, but seminal design is only seminal because it happens under the radar of the professional critics of its time. And by definition critics prefer subjects that need a critical interpretation to explain what they are saying, rather than those whose messages and audiences have no need or interest in a layer of over-intellectualised commentary.

james

/james souttar 05/06/2006

 

James - are you ok? You don’t want memories from your architecture - old kissess - you want your city to renew itself and create the backdrop, if not the opportunity, for new ones. And then I read on Ezri Tarazi’s ‘Design in crisis’ blog: “When this understanding eventually filters into our conceptions of communication, we will undoubtedly see a paradigm shift of an unprecedented kind. But for the moment, angst and same-old same-old.” I sense you want something new…?

My point, which isn’t meant to be personal, is that it’s interesting that it’s only through looking back - at a history, a pattern of use, that we start to build up a picture of things, people, events and flesh them out so we can see the relationships - so we can relate to them - for the future.

/Tyrone 03/07/2006

 

Sheesh, posted on wrong blog.

/Tyrone 03/07/2006

 

Tyrone, a thought which does realate to this discussion - and about my ‘wanting something new’. I have a friend who is a tattooist, and I often talk with her about the kinds of tattoos her clients want. Also, knowing that I have studied Arabic calligraphy, a few friends have asked me to design tatoos for them. And what I find is that, amongst people who are not designers, there is a considerable fascination with non Roman scripts - for decorations, jewellery, furnishings etc. David Beckham’s Devanagari tattoo of a few years ago is a case in point, but one can’t even walk through B&Q without seeing decorative transfers and stencils of Kanji characters etc. We are currently at a moment when there is considerable popular interest in, appreciation of and experimentation with the world’s wonderful heritage of visual language. Except, it seems, amongst British designers… look through any contemporary graphics magazine and one cannot but be struck by the relentless cultural chauvinism of the design industry. Apple’s extraordinary bequest of world scripts sits on the hard disk of every ‘Mac Monkey’s’ computer, generally untouched and unexplored. What kind of tattoos would graphic designers have? Judging by the tastes of this community, which seems - from the copious current examples of its work - never to have got over Modernism, I suspect only those in strictly gridded Univers or Helvetica, with no more than two sizes of type…

Yes, please, let’s have something new! If some people really want to go on rehashing Swiss typography, let them - that’s fine with me. But, personally, I am sooooooo bored with this recursive, back-catalogue approach to graphic design (which seems to parallel the ghastly period of pre-Indy, formulaic and energy-less manufactured music that we are mercifully now emerging from). I don’t particularly want to see endless cover versions of 1970s Wolfgang Weingart layouts - they didn’t do anything for me then, and certainly don’t do anything for me now. Instead I’d like to see at least some indication that British design recognises the exuberance and vitality of the diverse, multi-cultural society
taking shape around it - and can celebrate it!

james

/james souttar 05/07/2006

 

Aren’t some of those tatoos from a stock of non-graphic-designer, but equally ready-made clichés though (the Kanji script tatoos)… Ofcourse, they personalise - which is I guess what they are asking you to design - but how often do they actually innovate?

/Tyrone 05/07/2006

 

In November 2009 we released the book ‘Limited Language: Rewriting Design: Responding to a feedback culture’ which re-engaged with this original post.

For more on the book as a whole: http://bit.ly/bookcomments

//

/Colin + Monika 15/11/2009

 

write a comment

we encourage people to recycle your comments in their own research as we may collage them into our own writing with the aim to publish the resulting articles (any post eventually used will be credited). We encourage comments to be 200 words or more.

line and paragraph breaks automatic. e-mail address will never be displayed. html allowed: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>