categories
archives
rss

Visual communication in 0.4 seconds

“Beautiful as the chance encounter, on an operating table, of a sewing machine and an umbrella.”
Comte de Lautreamont, Songs of Maldoror (1869)

For the Surrealists, the work of Lautreamont was an inspiration and this line, taken from one of his poems, captures the essence of surrealist thinking – their search for the marvelous – the surreal - the eureka moment?

140 years after the chance encounter, between Alfred Nobel, nitroglycerine and silica (the basis of dynamite), a controlled explosion is detonated in secluded woodland in Stockholm. At the detonator stand the Swedish design team Front. In that moment of spark and ignition, the form of ‘Design in 0.4 Seconds’ is created - a soft lounge chair made from the mould of the explosion.

Front’s explosive interpretation of creativity is an element of the Front rationale of creative thinking: “Every product has a moment in which it is ‘made’. Usually, though, this is implicit. We are interested in capturing – as if to freeze-frame – that very moment of making and make it explicit.” Front’s real interest here is how its form is a product of randomness - a product of chance?
The paradox is that while the form of the chair is different each time, you always know – by design – that you will get a chair (unlike René Magritte’s famous pipe!). Front’s experiments capture the tension between creativity and thinking – the rational and irrational. It is this tension between the two worlds of inspiration and materialism that seduced the Surrealists - who remain, as ever, relevant today. But how can their work be re-evaluated in relation to visual communication, not least for its endeavors to capture the creative impulse?

The grid for instance, so often the basis of graphic design, would have been the cheese wire around the throat of inspiration in surrealist thinking. André Breton wrote in his Surrealist Manifesto of 1924, “We are still living under the reign of logic… But in this day and age logical methods are applicable only to solving problems of secondary interest.”

*
Every idea has its moment of inspiration, the moment in which it takes shape, but that taking of shape isn’t literal like Front’s lounge chair design. Andre Breton said that ‘‘beauty should be convulsive’’ – ideas and objects can be transformed into something else through representation. The Surrealists had many rationales for excavating such inspiration – capturing the moment that bridges thinking with the beautiful, the sublime. One that is relevant here is the explosante fixe, literally a fixed explosion: a camera can capture what the eye cannot see – creating a new reality out of the fabric of our day-to-day world. So, a photograph by Man Ray captures a whirling dancer whose seductive figure, at the split second of shutter release, is transformed into a sensuous lily.

…and strange objects come together in a poem, or elsewhere, and spark the imagination - like an explosion in a moment of quiet repose…

In these ‘illogical’ methods, can we find new ways to make solving the problems of visual communication of primary interest?

Limited Language 2006
Monika Parrinder and Colin Davies

 

8 comments

The Beat Generation were also looking at ways to jolt inspiration into life: From drug taking to the ‘cut-up’ method of writing. What would be interesting to look into would be how digital technology makes many of these avant-garde practices part of the day to day creation of visual work. Many of the practices that once hot wired our creative impulse are common and everyday in our visually mediated world - this is why the role of touch and sound are coming to the fore (as seen in the comments on this site). How we bring these senses into our day to day practices is something both commercial practice and education need to address - interactivity is more than screen based interaction. We need to realise this otherwise we end up with a world that is out of balance - screen over touch!

/jenny wright 08/10/2006

 

Jenny is right.

Surrealism in its afterlife - Photoshop. Parenthood. How about that advert of a young woman drinking cooking oil?

As for sound, we pass through various versions of the photocopier - tape, minidisc, CDRs and downloads. Software programmes like Pro Tools do give myriad options for abstraction but the impact on (sonic) culture is more determined by the mode of delivery, not origination any more. There is no more Frank Sinatra or Joy Division I do suspect. Tricky, where are you?

Split Second Feeling is an old Cabaret Voltaire track. William Burroughs was the last man to use a typewriter (still, I cannnot see JG Ballard using a computer). Man Ray is quite cleverly poised between photography, sound, cinema and touch, but not as much as Maholy-Nagy, whom fewer remember.

Loads might happen in 0.4 seconds, even in 0.3 seconds or possibly 5 minutes.

/jw 08/10/2006

 

It seems to me it’s right that it’s this idea of being poised between things (Man Ray, so many others) that opens up a creative space. On the one hand, it’s because when one operated between media, one is not within the methodology - familiar framing - of a particular discipline which might suggest, say with photogrpahy, how you should use the camera. I don’t want to suggest that learning the framework of a discipline is limiting in itself, far from it - I’m not at all keen on this idea that we can free-float between technologies and disciplines with the naive belief that a shift in register in itself will create something interesting. Edu-tainment, design-art, squeezy-cheese. Mmm.

…but you can look to see what is on the edges of your discipline, or outsde of it, or what it can not encompass and in that gap something becomes illuminated. That’s why Degas’ paintings of Parisian gentlemen walking out of frame seem so mysterious. That’s to me why Man Ray’s photo of the dancer/lily is so enigmatic - it suggests movement, illusion and fragility in a medium otherwise attuned to capturing, freezing, making permanent.

An operating table, a sewing machine and an umbrella don’t immediately suggest a narrative we are familiar with - and so demand a leap of the imagination.

/Gaby 10/10/2006

 

jw - there is a man on my road who uses a typewriter. It takes him ages.

/Anon 10/10/2006

 

What are ‘the problems of visual communication of primary interest’?

/adriana 30/10/2006

 

I think they meant to leave the ‘of’ out between communication and interest to make it read:
In these ‘illogical’ methods, can we find new ways to make solving the problems of visual communication primary interest?
In other words they are saying there is a problem with visual communication and solving these needs to be our priority.

/anon 03/11/2006

 

The final comment was a reference back to the Surrealist Manifesto - the publication of which, in 1924, coincided with the development of graphic design/visual commuincation as a rational, modernist practice. It feels therefore as if graphic design becomes, in this instance, denigrated to a practice of secondary interest. Speaking then of the contemporary moment, we are not suggesting that there is a problem with visual commuincation, but that the logic-visual communication link should not be so binding, and either way, that visual communication should not be of secondary interest.

/Monika 12/11/2006

 

In 2009 we released the book ‘Limited Language: Rewriting Design: Responding to a feedback culture’ which re-engaged with this original post.

For more on the book as a whole: http://bit.ly/bookcomments

Colin + Monika

/colin 15/11/2009

 

write a comment

we encourage people to recycle your comments in their own research as we may collage them into our own writing with the aim to publish the resulting articles (any post eventually used will be credited). We encourage comments to be 200 words or more.

line and paragraph breaks automatic. e-mail address will never be displayed. html allowed: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>